Westland Whirlwind (fighter)

Whirlwind
Westland Whirlwind in a rare Second World War colour photograph
Role Heavy fighter
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Westland Aircraft Limited
First flight 11 October 1938
Introduction June 1940
Retired October 1943
Primary user Royal Air Force
Produced 1940 – January 1942
Number built 116

The Westland Whirlwind was a British twin-engined heavy fighter developed by Westland Aircraft. It was the Royal Air Force's first single-seat, twin-engined, cannon-armed fighter, and a contemporary of the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane. It was one of the fastest aircraft when it flew in the late 1930s, and was much more heavily armed than any other. However, protracted development problems with its Rolls-Royce Peregrine engines delayed the entire project and only a relatively small number were ever built. During the Second World War only two RAF squadrons were equipped with the Whirlwind, and despite successful use as a fighter-bomber it was withdrawn from service in 1943.

Contents

Background

The Whirlwind was developed for the RAF in the mid 1930s, following the retirement of biplane fighters. With increased fighter attack speeds creating shorter times for firing on targets, it was decided to improve the amount of armament. Instead of two rifle-caliber machine guns, eight were required. Cannons, such as the 20mm Hispano-Suiza HS.404 which could fire exploding ammunition, offered another type of heavy firepower and requirements were made for aircraft designs which could carry four cannons.

A problem for designers in the 1930s was that most agile combat aircraft were generally small. These aircraft had limited fuel storage and only enough flying range for defensive operations. A multi-engined fighter appeared to be the best solution to the problem of range, but a fighter large enough to carry an increased fuel load might be too unwieldy to successfully engage in combat. Germany and the United States pressed ahead with their design programs, resulting in the Messerschmitt Bf 110 and the Lockheed P-38.

Design and development

Claims made about the Bf 110 interested the British Air Ministry, which issued specification F.37/35 in 1935 and called for a single-seat day and night fighter armed with four cannon. Six aircraft were submitted in response to the specification, of which three were twin-engined types: the Boulton Paul P.88, the Bristol Type 153A, the Hawker F.37/35 (which was a Hurricane variant), the Supermarine 312 (a Spitfire variant), the Supermarine 313 and the Westland P.9.

Although Supermarine's efforts were favoured due to their success previously with fast aircraft and the promise of the Spitfire which was undergoing trials, neither they nor Hawker were in a position to deliver a modified aircraft quickly enough. Westland which had less work and was more advanced in the project was chosen along with the P.88 and the Type 313 for construction. A contract for two P.9s was placed in February 1937 which were expected to be flying in mid-1938. The P.88s were ordered in December along with a Supermarine design to F37/35 but both were cancelled in January.[1]

Westland's design team, under the new leadership of Teddy Petter (who was later to design the English Electric Canberra, Lightning and Folland Gnat) designed an aircraft that employed state-of-the-art technology. The magnesium[2] monocoque fuselage was a small tube with a T-tail at the end, although as originally conceived, the design featured a twin tail which was discarded when large Fowler flaps were added that caused large areas of turbulence over the tail unit.[3] The horizontal stabilizer (tailplane) was moved up out of the way of the disturbed air flow caused when the flaps were down.[3]The engines were the Kestrel K.26, later renamed Peregrine, with internal exhaust and leading edge radiators to reduce drag.[2] The airframe was built completely of stressed-skin duraluminium, with the pilot sitting high under one of the world's first full bubble canopies, while the low and forward location of the wing made for superb visibility (except for directly over the nose). Four 20 mm cannon were mounted in the nose, making it the most heavily armed fighter aircraft of its era; the clustering of the weapons also meant that there were no convergence problems as with wing-mounted guns. Hopes were so high for the design that it remained "top secret" for much of its development, although it had already been mentioned in the French press.

The first prototype (L6844) flew on 11 October 1938, construction had been been delayed chiefly due to the new features and also the late delivery of the engines.[2] Further Service Trials carried out at Martlesham Heath. It exhibited excellent handling and was very easy to fly at all speeds. The only exception was the inadequate directional control during takeoff which necessitated an increased rudder area above the tailplane.[3] Production orders were contingent on the success of the test program; delays caused by over 250 modifications to the two prototypes led to an initial production order for 200 aircraft being held up until January 1939 followed by a second order for a similar number, deliveries to fighter squadrons being scheduled to begin in September 1940.[4] Earlier, due to the lower expected production at Westland, there had been suggestions that production should be by other firms and a early 1939 plan to build them at the Castle Bromwich factory was dropped in favour of Spitfire production.[2]

The Whirlwind was quite small, only slightly larger than the Hurricane in overall size, but smaller in terms of frontal area. The landing gear was fully retractable and the entire aircraft was very "clean" with few openings or protuberances. Radiators were in the leading edge on the inner wings rather than below the engines. This careful attention to streamlining and two 885 hp Peregrine engines powered it to over 360 mph (580 km/h), the same speed as the latest single-engine fighters.[3] The speed quickly garnered it the nickname Crikey (a minced oath meaning "Christ!"), which was inspired by a famous Shell advertisement of the day which depicted a laborer with a swivel neck seeing something flash past him at a very high rate of knots and trying to look in two directions simultaneously, exclaiming : "Crikey, that's Shell, that was !" This nickname was, apparently, first bestowed upon the Whirlwind by a local petrol station owner !

But there were problems as well. The aircraft had limited range, under 300 miles combat radius, which made it marginal as an escort. More troublesome were the continued failures of the Peregrine engine. It was originally intended to be one of Rolls' main designs, but the Merlin had become much more important to the war effort and the Peregrine was relegated to a secondary status and development cancelled (there being no other aircraft needing the engine); the first deliveries of Peregrine engines did not reach Westland until January 1940.

By 1940, the Supermarine Spitfire was mounting 20 mm cannons, so the "cannon-armed" requirement was also being met, and by this time the role of escort fighter was becoming less important as RAF Bomber Command turned to night bomber missions. The main qualities the RAF were looking for in a twin-engine fighter were range and carrying capacity (to allow the large radar apparatus of the time to be carried), in which requirements the Bristol Beaufighter could perform just as well as or even better than the Whirlwind.

Development and delivery problems with the Peregrine engines, along with a number of flying accidents and the aircraft’s high landing speed (which restricted the number of airfields from which it could operate), resulted in Whirlwind production being ended in January 1942, after the completion of just 112 production aircraft. Westland campaigned for the creation of a Mk II model, initially designed around a more powerful 1,010 hp Peregrine which was aborted owing to Rolls-Royce's cancellation of further development of the engine. Additional proposals by Petter similarly remained as "paper projects" and included re-engining with Bristol Hercules, American radials and even using two 1,400 hp Merlin XX engines, each concept being rejected by the Air Ministry.[5] Westland were aware that their design - which had been built around the Peregrine was incapable of being re-engined with anything larger.[6]

Operational history

The first squadron to receive the Whirlwind was No. 25, then based at North Weald. The squadron was fully equipped with Bristol Blenheim IF night fighters when Squadron Leader K. A. K. MacEwen flew prototype Whirlwind L6845 from Boscombe Down to North Weald on 30 May 1940. The following day it was flown and inspected by three of the squadron's pilots, and the next day was inspected by the Secretary of State for Air, Sir Archibald Sinclair, and Lord Trenchard. Two days later the second Whirlwind, a production model, was again flown in from Boscombe Down by Squadron Leader MacEwen, and later that day a pilot of the squadron solo'ed in it. On 17 June the AOC-in-C Fighter Command recommended that No. 25 Squadron be re-equipped with Bristol Beaufighter night fighters, as it was already an operational night fighter squadron, and Whirlwinds were not being produced fast enough. The three Whirlwinds supplied to No. 25 Squadron were transferred to No. 263 Squadron.

The first production Whirlwind delivered to No. 263 Squadron was P6966, which was collected by Squadron Leader H. Eeles on 24 June and flown to Grangemouth, where 263 Squadron was reforming after disastrous losses in the Norwegian Campaign, in which only four pilots survived. After the decision had been made that No. 263, not No. 25, would be the first operational Whirlwind squadron, No. 263 had to make do with the three initial aircraft, and was supplied with additional Hurricanes until more Whirlwinds became available. Slow deliveries and the delays involved in converting from Hawker Hurricanes to the new fighter, resulted in the squadron not becoming operational with Whirlwinds until December 1940.

The first Whirlwind was written off on 7 August when Pilot Officer McDermott had a tyre blow out while taking off in P6966. In spite of this he managed to get the aircraft airborne. Flying Control advised him of the dangerous condition of his undercarriage, and to land the aircraft in such condition was extremely hazardous. PO McDermott bailed out of the aircraft between Grangemouth and Stirling. The aircraft dived in and buried itself 30 feet into the ground (see Survivors).

No. 263 squadron became operational with the Whirlwind in December 1940, carrying out convoy patrols from Exeter. The Whirlwind’s first confirmed kill occurred on 8 February, when Pilot Officer Graham (P6969) shot down an Arado Ar 196 floatplane. P/O Graham was never seen again, and was believed to have died in the attack. From then on the Squadron was to have considerable success with the Whirlwind while flying against enemy Junkers Ju 88s, Dornier Do 217s, Bf 109s and Fw 190s. The squadron went on to carry out day bomber escort missions with the Whirlwinds, including the escort of six Blenheim squadrons to Antwerp on 12 August 1941. A second Whirlwind squadron, No. 137, flew the type from September 1941 until June 1943. In the summer of 1942, both squadrons' Whirlwinds were fitted with racks to carry two 250 lb or 500 lb bombs and redesignated Whirlwind IA, and nicknamed Whirlibombers. These undertook low-level cross-channel "Rhubarb" sweeps, attacking locomotives, bridges, shipping and other targets.

Channel Dash

No. 137 Squadron's worst losses were to be on 12 February 1942 during the Channel Dash, when they were sent to escort five British destroyers, unaware of the escaping German warships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau. Four Whirlwinds took off at 13:10 hours, and soon sighted warships through the clouds about 20 miles from the Belgian coast. They descended to investigate and were immediately jumped by about 20 Bf 109s of Jagdgeschwader 2. The Whirlwinds shot at anything they got in their sights, but the battle was against odds. While this was going on, at 13:40 two additional Whirlwinds were sent up to relieve the first four, still unaware of the danger. All six Whirlwinds failed to return.

Münsterland

From 24 October until 26 November 1943, Whirlwinds of 263 Squadron made several large attacks against the German blockade runner Münsterland, in dry dock at Cherbourg. As many as 12 Whirlwinds participated at a time in dive bombing attacks carried out from 12,000 to 5,000 ft using 250 lb bombs. The attacks were met by very heavy anti-aircraft fire, but virtually all bombs fell within 500 yards of the target. Only one Whirlwind was lost during the attacks.

Retirement

The last Whirlwind mission to be flown by 137 Squadron occurred on 21 June 1943, when five Whirlwinds took off on a "rhubarb" attack against the German airfield at Poix. Pilot Officer Barclay (P6993) was unable to locate the target and instead bombed a supply train north of Rue. While returning, the starboard throttle jammed in the fully open position and the engine eventually lost power. P/O Barclay made a forced landing in a field next to RAF Manston, but the aircraft was a complete write-off - a sad farewell to the Whirlwind, although, as in many other crash landings in the type, the pilot walked away unhurt.

In December 1943, No. 263 Squadron, the first and last squadron to operate the Whirlwind, turned in their aeroplanes and converted to the Hawker Typhoon. On 1 January 1944, the type was officially declared obsolete. The remaining serviceable aircraft were transferred to No. 18 Maintenance Unit, while those undergoing repairs or overhaul were only allowed to be repaired if they were in near-flyable condition, an official letter forbidding aircraft needing repair to be worked on.

Experimental conversions

One Whirlwind (P6972) was tested as a night fighter in 1940 with No. 25 Squadron, while the first prototype was tested with an armament configuration of 12 0.303 machine guns. Another Whirlwind had a single 37 mm cannon fitted.[7][8] The Whirlwind was built with exhaust "muffs" and landing lights suitable for night flying.[9]

Evaluation

The performance of the Peregrine engine fell off at altitude, so the Whirlwind was used almost exclusively at low level, where it could hold its own against the Bf 109. The aircraft proved a devastating fighter-bomber, armed with both cannon and bombs. Though the Peregrine is a much-maligned powerplant, in actuality it would prove more reliable than the troublesome Napier Sabre engine used in the Hawker Typhoon, the Whirlwind's successor.

In the ground-attack role the Whirlwind excelled, proving to be both an excellent bombing platform and highly durable. The presence of a second engine meant that many seriously damaged aircraft were able to return from dangerous bombing missions over occupied France and Belgium with one engine knocked out.

The Whirlwind's four 20mm cannon were to prove extremely effective. From 1941 until 1943, the aircraft would become a frequent unwelcome sight over German airfields, marshaling yards, and locomotives. The Whirlwind was used to particularly good effect as a gun platform for destroying German supply trains. Pilots were often credited with several trains damaged or destroyed in a single mission. The aircraft was also very successful in hunting and destroying German E-boats which operated in the English Channel.

The Whirlwind became distinguished for its survivability during crash landings and ground accidents. The placement of the wings and engines ahead of the cockpit allowed the aircraft to absorb a great deal of damage while the cockpit area remained largely intact. As a result, many pilots were able to walk away unhurt from aircraft that were totally written off, a rare occurrence in 1930s era aircraft.

All pilots who flew this aircraft enthused about it in the air. If the Whirlwind had a fault, it was its high approach and landing speed. Because of the low production level, based on the number of Peregrines available, no redesign of the wing was contemplated, although Westland did test the effectiveness of leading-edge slats to reduce speeds. When the slats were activated with such force that they were ripped off the wings, the slats were wired shut.[10]

Philip J.R. Moyes noted in Aircraft in Profile 191: The Westland Whirlwind:

The basic feature of the Whirlwind was its concentration of firepower: its four closely-grouped heavy cannon in the nose had a rate of fire of 600 lb./minute – which, until the introduction of the Beaufighter, placed it ahead of any fighter in the world. Hand in hand with this dense firepower went a first-rate speed and climb performance, excellent manoeuvrability and a fighting view hitherto unsurpassed. The Whirlwind was, in its day, faster than the Spitfire down low and, with lighter lateral control, was considered to be one of the nicest "twins" ever built… From the flying viewpoint, the Whirlwind was considered magnificent.[11]

Bruce Robertson, in The Westland Whirlwind Described, quotes a 263 Squadron pilot as saying, "It was regarded with absolute confidence and affection.” [8]

The aircraft is well summed up by Francis K. Mason’s comments in Royal Air Force Fighters of World War Two, Vol. One:

Bearing in mind the relatively small number of Whirlwinds that reached the RAF, the type remained in combat service, virtually unmodified, for a remarkably long time…The Whirlwind, once mastered, certainly shouldered extensive responsibilities and the two squadrons were called upon to attack enemy targets from one end of the Channel to the other, by day and night, moving from airfield to airfield within southern England.[12]

The last words on the subject were perhaps best stated by Dr. G. Buckwell who, as a young Sergeant Pilot with 263 Squadron, was shot down in a Whirlwind over Cherbourg. "The Whirlwind was great to fly - we were a privileged few":

In retrospect the lesson of the Whirlwind is clear… A radical aircraft requires either prolonged development or widespread service to exploit its concept and eliminate its weaknesses, Too often in World War II, such aircraft suffered accelerated development or limited service, with the result that teething difficulties came to be regarded as permanent limitations.[13]

Variants

P.9 prototype
Single-seat twin-engine fighter aircraft prototype. Two built (L6844 and L6845), can be distinguished from later production samples by the mudguards above the wheels (Though the first production sample (P6966) had them as well), the exhaust system and the so-called 'acorn' on the joint between fin and rudder. L6844 had a distinctive downward kink to the front of its pitot tube, atop the tail not seen again in following models. L6844's colour was dark grey and not red, as is often stated.
Whirlwind I
Single-seat twin-engine fighter aircraft, 400 ordered, 114 built
Whirlwind IA
Single-seat twin-engine fighter-bomber aircraft, fitted with underwing bomb racks, were nicknamed "Whirlibombers". At least 67 conversions made from the original Mk I fighter.

Operators

 United Kingdom

US Navy, one aircraft P6994 was sent to the USA for trials in June 1942 and survived there until at least late 1944.

Survivors

http://www.whirlwindfighterproject.org/

Specifications (Whirlwind)

Data from Flight 1942[15]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

See also

Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era

Related lists

References

Notes
  1. ^ Buttler pp 36-37
  2. ^ a b c d Buttler p37
  3. ^ a b c d Green 1964, p. 51.
  4. ^ James 1991, p. 263.
  5. ^ James, "From High Hopes to Low Level" 2006, p. 73.
  6. ^ Buttler p38
  7. ^ Green 1961, p. 125.
  8. ^ a b Robertson 1970, p. 16.
  9. ^ Flight 5 March 1942
  10. ^ James, "Westland's Double Trouble" 2006, p. 65.
  11. ^ Moyes 1967, pp. 278–279.
  12. ^ Mason 1969, p. 64.
  13. ^ Mason 1969
  14. ^ Westland Whirlwind fighter- help needed
  15. ^ Flight 5 March 1942 p196
Bibliography
  • Bingham, Victor. Whirlwind, The Westland Whirlwind Fighter. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishing Ltd., 1987. ISBN 1-85310-004-8.
  • Buttler, Tony. British Secret Projects: Fighters and Bombers 1935-1950. Earl Shilton, Leicester, UK: Midland, 2004. ISBN 1-85780-179-2.
  • Crawford, Alex and Phil H. Listemann. "Westland Whirlwind Mk.I." (Allied Wings No.4). London: Casemate Pub & Book Dist Llc, 2008. ISBN 2-9526381-8-7.
  • Green, William, ed. "Foremost with Four Cannon." Flying Review International', Volume 19, No. 7, April 1964.
  • Green, William. Warplanes of the Second World War, Fighters, Vol. 2. London: Macdonald, 1961.
  • Green, William and Gordon Swanborough. WW2 Aircraft Fact Files - RAF Fighters, Part 3. London: Jane's, 1981. ISBN 0-7106-0119-0.
  • Hall, Alan W. Westland Whirlwind F.Mk.I (Warpaint Series no.54). Luton, Berfordshire, UK: Warpaint Books, 2006. No ISBN.
  • James, Derek N. "From High Hopes to Low Level" (Database). Aeroplane, May 2006.
  • James, Derek N. Westland (Images of England). Gloucestershire, UK: Tempus Publishing Ltd., 1997. ISBN 0-7524-0799-6.
  • James, Derek N. Westland: A History. Gloucestershire, UK: Tempus Publishing Ltd., 2002. ISBN 0-7524-2772-5.
  • James, Derek N. Westland Aircraft since 1915. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1991. ISBN 1-55750-921-2.
  • James, Derek N. "Westland's Double Trouble" (Database). Aeroplane, May 2006.
  • Mason, Francis K. Royal Air Force Fighters of World War Two, Volume One. Windsor, Berkshire, UK: Hylton Lacy Publishers Ltd., 1969.
  • Mondey, David. Westland (Planemakers 2). London: Jane's Publishing Company, 1982. ISBN 0-7106-0134-4.
  • Morgan, Eric B. "Westland P.9 Whirlwind." Twentyfirst Profile, Vol.2, No.14. New Milton, Hertfordshire, UK: 21st Profile Ltd., ISBN 0-961-8120-11.
  • Moyes, Philip J.R. Westland Whirlwind (Profile No. 191). London: Profile Publications, 1967.
  • Ovcácík, Michal and Karel Susa. Westland Whirlwind: Mk.I Fighter, Mk.I fighter-bomber. Prague, Czech Republic: Mark 1 Ltd., 2002. ISBN 80-902559-6-5.
  • Robertson, Bruce. Westland Whirlwind Described. Dandenong, Victoria, Australia: Kookaburra Technical Publications, 1970. ISBN 085-88000-4-7.
  • Taylor, John W.R. "Westland Whirlwind" Combat Aircraft of the World from 1909 to the present. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1969. ISBN 0-425-03633-2.

External links